December 2007 Archives

Generational Profiling

| No Comments Bookmark and Share

I was reading an article on the Colorado Business Magazine website this morning and was awestruck by the blatant "Gen X/Gen Y" profiling being discussed by the distinguished members of the ColoradoBiz Economic Roundtable.

In the November issue, the aforementioned panel was chronicled discussing their concerns over the declining talent-base due to the lack of engineering and business majors. A valid concern and one I share. Unfortunately, the esteemed panel took the argument one step further by critiquing the younger generation's work ethic.

The CEO a technology consulting firm, said even a 45-hour work week appears to be too much for some young workers, compared with the 60- to 65-hour work weeks once typical for professional careers as little at four or five years ago.

The context of this statement, while a smite condescending, really shows a gap in understanding between older management and the younger workforce.

The people of Generations X & Y have grown up in an increasingly connected world where technology enables workflows that could only have been dreamed of even five years ago. Utilizing these new tools, young workers are finding they can work smarter, not harder. Unfortunately, because this can translate to less time in the office, others often misinterpret the worker as a slacker.

Maybe the Generation Y workers don’t appreciate their good fortune, that jobs have been relatively plentiful in their lifetimes. They haven’t been through the pain of massive layoffs, roundtable members pondered. "We haven’t had in our economy a grinding, just a hard grinding, recession for 25 years. Maybe that’s what we need," said jokingly, prompting laughter from the group.

I would argue that no participant of this group have actually experienced a recession of the magnitude suggested. This comment reeks of parental condescension and little constructive content. Though not all on this panel are stuck in their own ideals:

"They aren’t eight to five. They don’t mind working late hours if they have the flexibility," he said. "We have to plan better, have to think differently, in how we approach it."

This person grasps the key to motivating the younger workforce, even if not articulated well. While flexibility is definitely necessary, the phrase "have to think differently, in how we approach it" gives this member of Generation X hope. Because the worker of the future is looking for one thing above their paycheck, value.

I firmly believe that nearly every member of the Generations X & Y workforce would gladly put in extra hours for a good reason. And this is where I think today's current management practices break down. Where a traditional manger will use scare tactics and strong-arming to gain extra work from an employee, the younger workforce could be had for simply providing meaning.

If an employee can see and understand the intrinsic value to their own career of putting in the extra work on a team initiative, or "putting their nose to the grindstone" on a project deadline, stretching the work week when necessary should come without complaint.

I've only scratched the surface on this topic, and plan to write future posts (real work-life balance, tips on motivating Gen ?) to continue this discussion, but I would like to leave any manager looking at this with a singular thought: quality is not only a better metric of productivity than quantity, it is a better motivator for the new workforce.

I was at an Oracle conference here in Denver yesterday, listening to dour presentations of their attempt to unite all of their varied middleware under the name of Fusion when I was pleasantly surprised by one of the best presentations I've seen in a long time.

After a pretty boring keynote presentation and lackluster demo of BPEL (which seems to be their magic bullet for unifying "Fusion"), on walks Vince Casarez. For the next 45 minutes I was riveted.

Vince took all of the basic elements of a software presentation and simplified it, designed it, and added a little flare. His presentation had:

  • Good vocal cadence. His voice ranged up ad down and changed rhythm throughout the presentation
  • Simple, clear slides. The slides kept to the Presentation Zen ideal of limiting text and using high end graphics very nicely
  • Good anecdotes to help illustrate certain points or to better answer audience questions
  • Spelled out acronyms he used in the presentation (THANK YOU!!!)

For that little bit of flair, he inserted 3-4 thirty second videos of customer interviews discussing the value they found in the new product. While the video had some sync issues and the content was pretty thin, the idea was sound.

The presentation was not overly technical nor too basic. This one presentation did a great job of what the whole day was intended to do, explain how the new Fusion project would unify all of Oracle's tools and applications into a single unified framework.